Friday, November 07, 2008

Can Najib Reinvent UMNO and Malaysia?

I am still reeling with good feeling listening to Obama's historical victory speech. It was inspirational. This speech wasn't intended just for Democrats, or Americans, but for the world.
There was a "grown up" greatness about Obama's speech--it was not a flashy advertisement, it was a thoughtful, respectful address.
At the same time, felt very much disgusted with Najib's presentation of additional economic measures in winding up the Budget in Parliament. Disgusted to see how he has no balls to open the floors for questions and debate.

The antics of BN MPs are also embarassing. 'Mengampu tidak bertempat' especially the one from Rompin, my MP. We have a 'bastard' MP from Perak. And of course, the dewan speaker is another story.

After 51 years of merdeka, we do, after all, need to grow up, and work together to help the country we all love, even if we disagree amongst ourselves. We are a nation of many differences, that is one our greatest strengths. Yes, we can.

But I do not believe that Najib can. He has failed even before he starts.

Reinventing US and the world

If you give me your vote," Barack Obama cried last Monday, 'we won't just win the election - together, we will change this country and change the world.' That is the extravagant promise he must now honour.
His Herculean task is to correct and reverse the crimes and blunders of the Bush era. To his great advantage, his historic victory will give him vast momentum and uncontested legitimacy. His enemies have been thrown into disarray. The Republican Party will probably split and may need years to recover.
Obama rides to power on a landslide which was as brilliant a demonstration of democracy as the world has seen. No other country could begin to match it. And by putting a black man in the White House, Americans have taken a giant step towards healing the racial wound that has plagued their country since its foundation.
They have also contributed mightily to bridging the racial divide between a white and prosperous West and the rest of struggling humanity - whether black, brown or yellow. Obama is thus a shining symbol of the mixed-race world of the 21st century.
If the new President is to reinvent America's name abroad and restore its battered reputation, he must undertake a radical revision of the principles and practices of the Bush administration's foreign policy.
This will mean a rejection of unilateralism, of militarism, of preventive wars, of the crude, un-nuanced 'global war on terror', and of all the horrors and violations of domestic and international law associated with Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo and the many other black holes where America buried the often innocent victims of its savage revenge for 9/11.
The world will be eagerly watching whom Obama picks as his secretary of state and secretary of defence. These early choices - among the thousands his administration will have to make in the coming weeks - will give a clue to the policies he intends to pursue.
Most Arabs will pray that he will not bring back to office members of Bill Clinton's Middle East team, discredited by their failure to advance the peace process and by their excessive partiality for Israel.
For the Arab and Muslim world, Obama's victory means the defeat of America's neo-conservatives, those fraudulent architects of the Iraq war. It means the final end of the neo-cons' geopolitical fantasy of 'reforming' the Arab world by military force to make it safe for the US and Israel.

Together with their numerous propaganda organs - the American Enterprise Institute, the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, The Weekly Standard and the like - the neo-cons backed the Republican John McCain. Their hope was that a McCain victory would give them a chance to finish the job begun under Bush.
These pro-Israeli hard-liners believed that, for Israel to retain its regional dominance, the Arab and Muslim world had to be brought to its knees. Hence the invasion and destruction of Iraq; hence their noisy campaign for an American war against Iran - and, if not war, then harsh sanctions to undermine Iran's economy. Judging from his speeches - and from his third-world background - Obama's approach will be radically different.
He has pledged to declare that 'America is not at war with Islam.' He seems determined to rebuild America's shattered relations with the Arab and Muslim world. He will undoubtedly seek to escape from the strategic shackles and ideological muddle of Bush's war on terror. Little wonder that Israel was just about the only country in the world where a sizeable majority prayed for a McCain victory. What should Obama's priorities be in the Middle East?
He must honour his pledge to pull US troops out of Iraq within 16 months. Rather than sending more troops into the morass of Afghanistan, he should press for an early ceasefire, followed by a negotiated end to the conflict with the Taliban, offering them a share in government provided they sever their links with Al Qaida. In the meantime, US cross-border missile strikes into Pakistan must cease, since they serve only to destabilise that country and arouse bitter anger against the United States.
Obama must address the festering Arab-Israeli conflict more urgently and more seriously than any American president before him. This means a two-state solution of the Israeli-Palestinian problem, but it must also mean a comprehensive peace involving Syria, Lebanon and all 22 Arab countries on the basis of the Arab Peace Plan of 2002, or something very much like it.
The United States cannot solve all the world's problems on its own. It is no longer the unchallenged superpower but only one pole - if admittedly the most important one - in a multi-polar world, which includes China, the European Union, Russia, India, Brazil, South Africa, and even the Arabs.
Obama seems to understand that a genuinely multilateral approach will be necessary. He must take the lead in creating a new global political architecture in which emerging powers will be given an equal voice.
Will Obama manage to make progress on any of these fronts? Judging from his campaign, his approach will be pragmatic, moderate and conciliatory. He has promised to bring Republicans into his administration. He may be a radical but he is not a revolutionary.
All those optimists in the Middle East who dream of a new America - honest, peaceable and fair, free from the nefarious pressures of special interest groups - should remember that Obama promised only 'change we can believe in.' He did not promise utopia.

Patrick Seale is a commentator and author of several books on Middle East affairs.

Raja, Pemimpin dan Kita - Malaysiakini

Kali terakhir saya berkesempatan untuk berbual dengan seorang Sultan dari Malaysia ialah pada tahun 2001 di satu majlis makan malam sambutan Tahun baru Cina di Dubai. Sebelum itu, saya sempat makan malam dengan Sheikh Mohamed al Maktoum di istana musim panasnya kerana meraikan kejayaan pembukaan Dubai Internet City bersama rakan sekerja lain.
Sultan Pahang sudi untuk menghadiri majlis tersebut disebuah kedai kepunyaan usahawan Cina dari Malaysia. Usahawan itu pernah menjadi salah seorang sahabat sebelum dia melarikan diri dari Dubai. Dikatakan membawa jutaan duit pinjaman bank ke Malaysia dan dijejak oleh Polis Dubai sehingga kini.
Setelah menanti agak lama, Sultan Pahang muncul. Baginda terlewat. Saya sudah kelaparan.
Dalam bersalaman dengan tetamu, saya sempat bertanya sambil berjenaka dengan baginda.
"Mengapa lambat tuanku?"

Baginda terkejut tetapi menjawab dengan secara berjenaka.

"Traffic jam!"

Saya kembali berjenaka.

"Mana ada traffic jam kat Dubai, lainlah di KL!"

Kami ketawa. Ketika itu, 2001 memang tiada traffic jam di Dubai. Ke mana-mana destinasi dalam 20 minit sahaja. Memang nostalgik bagi orang lama yang menetap di Dubai.

Sewaktu memulakan mengambil makanan dari bufet yang disediakan, saya berdiri di sebelah sana meja berdepan dengan baginda.

Sewaktu baginda menyeduk mengambil makanan, saya menyorong pinggan ke arah baginda.

Sekali lagi baginda terkejut.

"Awak suruh saya hidangkan ke?"

Entah bagaimana malam itu saya agak berani.

"Bila lagi saya nak minta Tuanku hidangkan...!"

Saya nampak duta ketika itu sudah resah. (Mungkin mahu kena penampar budak ini...)

Sultan Pahang ketawa, mengambil juadah dan meletakkan ke atas pinggan saya.

Bila Sultan ketawa, yang lain pun ketawa.

Kemudian baginda bertanya kepada saya, "Kamu orang mana?"

"Saya orang Rompin Tuanku!"

"Oh! Anak buah saya juga rupanya!"

Baginda memperkenalkan Sultanah kepada saya dan kami berbual dengan mesra terutama mengenai penglibatan saya dengan Dubai Internet City, satu-satunya projek mega Sheikh Mohamed ketika itu.

Sewaktu sekolah di Kuantan, saya pernah menerima hadiah pemidato terbaik peringkat negeri Pahang di istana baginda. Malah, hari kelahiran saya sama dengan hari keputeraan aruah Sultan Abu Bakar, sepatutnya layak menerima hadiah setiap tahun sewaktu baginda masih hidup, malangnya saya dilahirkan di negeri Johor.

Saya teringat pertemuan dengan baginda Sultan Pahang tersebut setelah membaca Malaysiakini, Raja Nazrin: Rulers will not act on wrong advice!

Raja Nazrin adalah salah seorang Tengku Mahkota, anak Sultan yang mempunyai ijazah dari Oxford dan Harvard. Intelektual dan pemikir yang mungkin lebih sesuai sebagai Perdana Menteri yang kita tidak punyai.

Saya bersetuju dengan Raja Nazrin terutama mengenai yang Raja-Raja tidak harus beri berkenan dengan nasihat dari pemimpin yang bercanggah dengan perlembagaan, bertentangan dengan keluhuran undang-undang dan melanggar prinsip keadilan sejagat.
Begitupun, pemimpin yang dipilih oleh rakyat semestinya juga menjaga hak rakyat yang diamanahkan. Pemimpin menjadi perantara antara Raja dan rakyat. Malangnya, ramai pemimpin yang bukan sahaja korup dengan mencuri harta dan wang rakyat, malah sebenarnya pengkhianat kepada Raja juga.

Baca seterusnya -

Raja Petra Makes Headline in the UAE today

Raja Petra Raja Kamaruddin, right,
with his wife Marina Abdullah wave
at the High Court in Shah Alam, outside Kuala Lumpur.
Prominent Malaysian blogger released from prison
AgenciesPublished: November 07, 2008, 12:19
Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian authorities freed the editor of an anti-government news Web site Friday after a court decided that his arrest under a law allowing indefinite detention was illegal.

High Court Justice Syed Ahmad Helmy Syed Ahmad ruled that the home minister acted outside his powers in having Raja Petra Kamaruddin detained September 12 for allegedly causing ethnic tensions.
Five hours later, a weary-looking Raja Petra was brought from a prison camp in northern Malaysia to the court in Shah Alam city near Kuala Lumpur, where he embraced his tearful wife and daughters after being formally released.
"I'm really glad it's over. I'm really tired. The judge's decision proves there is no justification for my detention," Raja Petra told reporters.
The government has accused Raja Petra, 58, of threatening public security and causing ethnic tension by publishing writings that ridiculed Islam in the Muslim-majority country.
He has infuriated authorities by publishing numerous claims of alleged wrongdoing by government leaders on his highly popular Web site, Malaysia Today.
The government has denounced most of Raja Petra's allegations as lies. He is also on trial in a separate case in which he has been accused of sedition by implying that Deputy Prime Minister Najib Razak was involved in the murder of a Mongolian woman. If convicted, he faces up to three years in jail.